Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Mo, 02 Jun 2008, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Okay, the patch I sent to the mailing list earlier is now tested and
>> checked in.
>
> Funny. Now that I look into that (a bit late I know), I see
> texlive-base/debian/texlive-base.{post{inst,rm},preinst}.pre.disabled
> Have you taken a look at that? It was about take-over with preservation
> in case of cancelled upgrade ...
I fear it's too late indeed. The corresponding preinst script assumes
that there is no 10texlive-base.cnf yet. We could maybe profit from that
trick for the upgrades from etch, but I'm not even sure that it would
work. Wouldn't dpkg tell the upgrader "10texlive-base.cnf created by you
or a script" if we just mv 10texlive-base-bin.cnf to that name?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
