Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 10:23 -0300 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > smbfs is still (and will be) removed from samba and kernel 2.6.27 will > > remove it too. > > > cifs is the replacement but you need a newer kernel for this. > > If this is not possible on your side I see nothing we can do for you > > because upstream (samba and kernel) removed/is removing smbfs. > > > I would like to close the bug because there is nothing we can do. > > Or do you prefer to get it tagged "wontfix" which isn't the case IMHO. > > I consider it an upstream bug that cifs requires one to specify both the > netbiosname and the hostname in order to connect to a Win9x server, so I > think there is something we should be doing here.
OK, but this IMHO isn't reported in the bugreport. The described problem from Elmar is about the switch smbfs -> cifs and an old kernel. The need of netbiosname and hostname should be a new/other bug report because it is/was not Elmars problem. Thats why I wanted to close it. But its not so important to have it in this or a new bugreport.;) -- Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
