On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:23:29 -0400, Mateu X. Hunter wrote:

> For what it's worth, here's a comment from 'mst' the author of the
> module.
> "the .pl in re.pl shouldn't be considered to be a suffix, it's simply
> part of the name of the script"

Right, in this case that might be a valid reason for an exception.
 
> btw, re.pl runs OK for me, i.e no problem finding 'setup_commands' in 
> Devel/REPL/Plugin/Commands.pm

I have the same problem as Damyan.

Hm, "setup_commands". There's a patch in the Debian package of
Devel::REPL that touches this ...

Ok, building the package without the patch fixes the problem.

Good. Let's fix this first before deciding about the location/name of
the script :)

Cheers,
gregor
 

-- 
 .''`.   Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux User, Admin, & Developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., Fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Tom Waits: The Part You Throw Away

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to