On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:49:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > tags 491762 -moreinfo > thanks > > Quoting Martin Bagge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > tags 491762 -moreinfo > > > For this to work, the mail should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well. > > Common practice is to put that address in BCC so that spammer's > address fishing have less chances to grab that address (random spam > sent to control could lead to inappropriately tag or even close bugs). > > I just bcc'ed that address in this very mail. > > Andrew, I found this problem because I was considering dhcp3 for an > l10n upload. Do you mind if I start the process now (no NMU probably, > just a last l10n update round, in case) If you want to do an update round, I can make another upload with the results.
regards Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
