Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> It is unusable on an unknown amount of machines. I would have no problem
> with that if it is only installed on request, but it is included in the
> laptop task and therefor a standard package.

So?

That still makes a good argument for "Severity: important" if you
think that this deserve such importance..

This could make an argument to remove it from the laptop task, maybe.

(please note that I do not necessarily agree with both of those
statements, I just bring you less violent options than an RC bug)

But I don't see this as enough to virtually suggest that the package
as is should not be shipped with lenny.

As Sven pointed later, does the kernel driver "know" what machines
will properly wake up after suspend? From my experience, this is
mandatory.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to