On Tue, 10, Mar, 2009 at 07:33:13AM +0100, Michael Hanke spoke thus..
> Dear ftp-masters,
>
> the recently accepted 'caret' package received a bug report asking for
> clarification of the debian/copyright wrt to a listed non-free license.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518688
>
> The original request to include a verbatim copy of the file is attached
> below.
>
> Would it be acceptable to remove to OpenContent license from
> debian/copyright, as it is not relevant for the pieces of AFNI code
> included in caret (which are licensed under the GPL-2+)? Or do you
> recommend/require the full specs of the AFNI package to be present?
If the code isn't shipped in the orig tarball (which it shouldn't be
otherwise the package doeesn't belong in main), then you don't need to
mention the licenses of the non-free parts (we're not distributing
them).
Hope that clarifies,
Mark
--
Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the Lawyers"
Henry VI Part II, Shakespeare
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
