On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:33:33PM +0000, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Tue, 10, Mar, 2009 at 07:33:13AM +0100, Michael Hanke spoke thus.. > > Dear ftp-masters, > > > > the recently accepted 'caret' package received a bug report asking for > > clarification of the debian/copyright wrt to a listed non-free license. > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518688 > > > > The original request to include a verbatim copy of the file is attached > > below. > > > > Would it be acceptable to remove to OpenContent license from > > debian/copyright, as it is not relevant for the pieces of AFNI code > > included in caret (which are licensed under the GPL-2+)? Or do you > > recommend/require the full specs of the AFNI package to be present? > > If the code isn't shipped in the orig tarball (which it shouldn't be > otherwise the package doeesn't belong in main), then you don't need to > mention the licenses of the non-free parts (we're not distributing > them).
Thanks for clarifying! The code is not shipped (of course) and hence I am going to clarify/simplify the copyright statement. Thanks, Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
