Hi Thomas! On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Girard <[email protected]> wrote: > Package: ace > Version: 5.6.3-5 > Severity: normal > >> Hello Pascal, >> >> Pascal Giard a écrit : >>> If i use a protocol other than iiop, the Naming_Service throws an >>> error.... >>> >>> e.g. >>> $ Naming_Service -ORBListenEndpoints 'uiop:///tmp/mylocalsock' >>> TAO (2512|3077675232) no usable transport protocol was found. >>> (2512|3077675232) EXCEPTION, TAO_Naming_Server::init_with_orb >>> system exception, ID 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/BAD_PARAM:1.0' >>> TAO exception, minor code = 11 (endpoint initialization failure in >>> Acceptor Registry; EINVAL), completed = NO >>> >>> Failed to start the Naming Service. >>> >>> Same happens with other protocols i expected to be supported, namely: >>> shmiop, uiop and diop. >>> >>> I've search the web and those protocols are expected to work with >>> TAO... Am i missing something? >> >> >> Sorry for the late reply. Can you reproduce it with upstream TAO >> version? I'm wondering if this is not due to IPv6 activation... >> >> I'll try to reproduce this and let you know. Bouncing this to Debian bug >> robot so that this issue stays visible.
I didn't have to go that far... i must be misunderstanding something as TAO's performance test named "Explicit_Binding" works. (I've taken it from your orig tarball). Note that they're overriding the protocol policy... it isn't passing thru a Naming Service either. Now i'm left wondering what i'm doing wrong or what i'm missing. I wish there were examples using anything but iiop and/or that TAO's Developer's Guide would be available for consultation. -Pascal -- Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu) Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://lacime.etsmtl.ca) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
