Hallo Hartmut, Am 2009-06-15 09:22:24, schrieb Helmut Grohne: > Thanks for your quick answer.
> Could you give any reference for this statement? The statement is
> practically untrue.
This is from the RFC's about Mailheaders, and it is also written, that
the the receiver should not expect, that ALL headers are available.
> Also messages are often needed verbatim (for instance for reporting
> spam). Why should a message change, only because it got moved from one
> mailbox to another?
The message is changed the first time when you access it and I even
have not accessed a message and found "Content-Lenght:" header in
message which where only accessed by "libnet-imap-simple-perl". I do not
believe, the perllib has put the header into the message.
Are you sure, it is mutt who is adding the "Content-Lenght:" header?
> Fortunately the patch only improves the situation: There is no point in
> adding these headers for Maildir or imap and other storages are
> unchanged. (It would also save about 1MB diskspace for me.)
Ehm, with one header?
I asume, 32 Bytes per message which mean 32k messages. I feel this like
a joke... I have on my server arround 48 million messages and it is only
1.4 GByte.
And I do not belive the 32bytes additional size will hit your filesystem
be exceeding the blocksize usage... e.g. 32k msg * 4kB/block = 128MByte
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
