Frank Küster wrote: > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config > > This is still accessible: > > $ ll /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2005-07-26 11:58 /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config -> > /etc/texmf/dvipdfm
Why is it not owned by any package then? $ dpkg -S /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config dpkg: /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config not found. The same applies to the other files which are still used/accessible. I find this particularly strange for /etc/texmf/dvips/config.download35 and /etc/texmf/dvips/config.builtin35. The former belongs to tetex-base, the latter does not belong anywhere. Why is this the case? Did I missunderstand something? > What should we do with the useless ini files? I'm pretty sure that > hardly anybody has local configuration there, because everyone who > can successfully change them knows better and will have renamed the > file. On the other hand, I'm damn sure somebody will complain it is a > policy violation if we just delete them. > > Hm, the postinst script should check the md5sums and delete them only > when unchanged. And if some are changed, it should rename it - > maybe add a suffix ".unused"? Sounds good to me. cheerio ralf
