Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.5-2
Severity: important
Holger Levsen:
how about the compromise and doing both, except that for (1) we file the bugs
with severity important?
Hi Jonas,
as recently pointed out on debian-devel [1], the netatalk package is
accidently linked against libssl on some arches due to dirty buildd
chroots. To avoid this license violation, explicit Build-Conflicts
against libssl-dev should be added and only be removed if
$DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "openssl".
Cheers,
Fabian
[1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00354.html>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (550, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
