On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:28:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:55:35AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >as recently pointed out on debian-devel [1], the netatalk package >is accidently linked against libssl on some arches due to dirty >buildd chroots. To avoid this license violation, explicit >Build-Conflicts against libssl-dev should be added and only be >removed if $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "openssl"....or netatalk build routines tightened to not link against openssl even if available, I assume.The latter is definitely preferred since DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS can't change the value of Build-Conflicts...
True. Other (more complex) mechanisms like using a debian/control.in.in file is possible, however.
Unfortunately I already set --without-openssl-dir which apparently had no effect. I will try setting --with-openssl-dir=/dev/null :-/
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
