On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > probably it is in the worse shape since probably 1.0.1 has addressed > > some bugs since 0.99, and from what I remember upstream has aged > > this release for a while as well! > Surprisingly, I don't see any bugreports. But oh well.
well -- I was occupied chatting with you -- now they are on their way
> > So, once again, any objective reason besides desire to "age" it a
> > bit? Or do you have some private stress-testing battery for
> > python-networkx?
> I have several tools that depend on it, and yes, I do test packages
> myself.
By "several tools" you are of cause not referring to some personal
projects but to the packages in Debian proper that would be negatively
affected by an upload to unstable. I would be curious to learn which
packages these are so I could volunteer to ease the transition by
providing patches via bugreports.
> Getting stuff uploaded by some random guy in a hurry doesn't
> look quite right to me.
I like Debian because so many random guys made it possible.
> > I love arguments toward doing everything the last day
> I love NMUs after 2 weeks.
it has been more than 2 weeks since upstream release.
I have re-uploaded it into delayed 15 (2weeks + 1day) so you feel
comfortable.
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
