Hi again!
* Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> [2010-02-10 21:01:23 CET]:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > I would suggest to get rid of the first paragraph of the long
> > description all together, somehow it doesn't make much sense to
> > duplicate the short description into the long description. :)
>
> Hmmmm. This is a weird one. It's true that the meaning is the same,
> but it's not an exact duplicate - the long description is pretty much
> taken verbatim from Eric Meyer's S5 webpage, and the first "paragraph"
> is actually an explanation for the "S5" name.
It still feels like a synopsis and is similar enough to feel like a
duplication. ;) Didn't know that it was meant as an explenation of the
name, though.
> Do you think something like the following could work?
>
> --- control (revision 4443)
> +++ control (working copy)
> @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
> Architecture: all
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ucf
> Description: A simple HTML-based presentation system
> - S5: A Simple Standards-Based Slide Show System
> - .
> S5 is a slide show format based entirely on XHTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
> With one file, you can run a complete slide show and have a
> printer-friendly version as well. The markup used for the slides is
> @@ -23,3 +21,5 @@
> and figure out how to adapt it to their particular needs. Anyone
> familiar with CSS can create their own slide show theme. It's totally
> simple, and it's totally standards-driven.
> + .
> + The name S5 stands for "a simple standards-based slide show system".
Maybe capitalize the five S in there to make it more clear, and leave
off the "a". Sounds good to me, and moving it last is also a good idea
because it's just additional information, not that essential.
> And thanks for taking a look at the s5 package! :)
Thanks for packaging it. I wonder, are you aware of the Debian theme
for it?
Have fun!
Rhonda
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
