On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:28:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:04:20AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:56:24AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:58:31PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Package: openssl > > > > Version: 0.9.8k-7 > > > > Severity: normal > > > > Tags: patch > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > Usertags: sparc64 > > > > > > > > openssl fails to build on SPARC64, due to a missing debian specific > > > > target for this architecture. Please find a patch below to add it. With > > > > it openssl successfully builds and pass the testsuites. > > > > > > > > Can you please add it in the next upload? Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Is there some reason you didn't base this on the sparc-v9 line? > > > As far as I know, all 64 bit sparc's are v9. So you could for > > > instance add sparcv8plus.o. You might also want to look at > > > solaris64-sparcv9-gcc > > > > SPARC 64 bits can also be used as 32-bit, in which case the ABI is > > called sparcv8 plus. It is not compatible with the sparcv9 ABI. > > Therefore sparcv8plus.o can't be used and even does not compile. > > > > I have created this line mixing the linux64-sparcv9 line and the > > solaris64-sparcv9-gcc line. I have added -Wa,--noexecstack as on other > > debian lines, and removed -mcpu=ultrasparc which is the default in our > > gcc compiler. > > Ok. Patch is applied and will be in the next upload. >
Thanks. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
