Il 13/05/2010 13:29, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > How the hell “therefore”? Imagine a second libv8 is available, the > build will crash at the very same place. From what you wrote, *this* > bug is *not* fixed, and build-depending on an extra package is *not* > going to fix this bug. > > Please get your logic straight.
I forgot to say that now both libv8 and chromium-browser have: Architecture: i386 amd64 armel mips
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
