On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 08:24:16PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:08:05PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:24:34AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Policy 2.9.1 allows using architecture wildcards. This is probably the > > > way to go, and it will prevent changes to be done for each new linux > > > architecture. Please find a patch doing that below. > > Do you know offhand the minimum versions of dpkg and sbuild that implement > > this? I'm happy if we can finally make this change, but we don't want to > > break compatibility with lenny backport builds. > I don't know the minimum version of dpkg, but it is supported in lenny > already. For sbuild, it is something more recent and mostly depends on > the fork of sbuild you are using. Ok - do you know whether backports.org is compatible? (Also, do you happen to know if Launchpad is compatible? It's not a blocker for making this change in Debian if not, but I would like to know in advance that we'll need to revert this patch.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
