On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:11:04PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 08:24:16PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:08:05PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:24:34AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> 
> > > > Policy 2.9.1 allows using architecture wildcards. This is probably the
> > > > way to go, and it will prevent changes to be done for each new linux
> > > > architecture. Please find a patch doing that below.
> 
> > > Do you know offhand the minimum versions of dpkg and sbuild that implement
> > > this?  I'm happy if we can finally make this change, but we don't want to
> > > break compatibility with lenny backport builds.
> 
> > I don't know the minimum version of dpkg, but it is supported in lenny
> > already. For sbuild, it is something more recent and mostly depends on
> > the fork of sbuild you are using.
> 
> Ok - do you know whether backports.org is compatible?
> 
> (Also, do you happen to know if Launchpad is compatible?  It's not a blocker
> for making this change in Debian if not, but I would like to know in advance
> that we'll need to revert this patch.)
> 

>From what I just get told, it will work for backports.org too, though we
are not sure that edos-debcheck, used by wanna-build, will be ok to cope
with that (even in sid).

I have no idea about launchpad, and I don't really know who to ask to
get the information.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
[email protected]                 http://www.aurel32.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to