severity 591886 minor retitle 591886 RFC 17a lost in changed packaging scheme thanks
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Iustin Pop wrote: > > I've dropped intentionally the non-issues RFCs from the packaging, as > > rfc-editor doesn't provide any content for them, and they are marked as > > such in rfc-index.txt. > > I'm sorry, I tested for virtually everything I thought about, even for > zero-length files, but not for content like "RFC x was never issued." > > However, I did this now, and... > > > Did you see any real RFCs missing? > > One of them at least contains more than the above content :) > > usr/share/doc/RFC/unclassified/rfc17a.txt Yes, I know about that RFC and its special naming, but I thought it was not provided anymore. I see now that it is, and that I missed it. Sorry! I'm marking the bug as minor (this is just one very old RFC), and will fix it with the next upstream release probably, as the size of the packages is big enough that I don't think a new upload just for this bug is warranted. thanks! iustin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
