Le mardi 16 août 2005 à 17:18 +0200, Enrico Zini a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > Please use system, packaged, thescoder instead of a compiled version. > > It is newer, and it would simplify the build and maybe even more > > ... > > To do this, you just need to modify debian/rules and add a build-depends on > > thescoder. > > Thanks for reporting! That's absolutely right. I tell you a secret: > it's exactly the reason why I uploaded thescoder in Debian in the first > place ;-) I suppose that it was meant to be used by other languages too. I'm french-speaker, and the thesaurus.txt (the source if I understand correcty) is missing, so in the end I don't need (yet) thescoder, but I thought it could be useful to make you aware(/remind you) of this. I don't use the IT thesaurus myself, nor do any of my customers.
> Thing is, the current openoffice.org-thesaurus-it has been uploaded > before thescoder was accepted in Debian. And the current package works, > and there is no difference between the stand-alone thescoder and the one > in this package for what the Italian thesaurus is concerned (the changes > are used by the German thesaurus, though). So, don't worry, if your > Italian thesaurus is compiled with his own thescoder, you are not > missing anything. That's why it's a wishlist. If you want to, I can even submit a patch to you for your package, I have it handy. > As soon as I have to make a new release (such as a new upstream version) > I'll definitely switch to using the thescoder in its own package. I think there is a new upstream release of the IT thesaurus. Maybe it's the right time to do it? Maybe it's also the right time to support OOo2(only in experimental at the moment) as well? > Ciao, > > Enrico -- Jérôme Warnier FLOSS Consultant http://beeznest.net
