Am Samstag, den 21.08.2010, 23:09 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri: > Then just add TAG=="udev-acl" to the last rule, no big deal. I don't understand, what exactly do you mean?
> They should not, it is not even a public interface. Feel free to report > bugs on them. I would be happy to report these bugs, but I think that the package maintainers just looked at `70-acl.rules' and figured that they need to set ACL_MANAGE in order to update the ACLs. One can hardly blame them. So if you think that using ACL_MANAGE is wrong that is your decision, but please don't break other packages since * I don't see any real need for it * It's not the other packages fault (at least not completely) * There might be well more than the two packages I mentioned, it will take time to make them all use TAG+="udev-acl" Best regards Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
