On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:21:23PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Well, honestly, I don't know. I use the packages provided with the latest > Ubuntu (10.10), but I'm using mainly GraphicsMagick instead of ImageMagick. > I will have a try with ImageMagick headers instead to see if it is working > nicely.
I replaced imagemagick by graphicsmagick (version 1.3.12) now and was running in the same error: ** Compiling 'CImg_demo (1.4.5)' with 'gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8) ' g++ -o CImg_demo CImg_demo.cpp -I.. -Wall -W -lm -lpthread -lHalf -O3 -fno-tree-pre -Dcimg_use_vt100 -I/usr/X11R6/include -Dcimg_use_xshm -Dcimg_use_xrandr -Dcimg_use_tiff -Dcimg_use_openexr -I/usr/include/OpenEXR -Dcimg_use_png -Dcimg_use_jpeg -Dcimg_use_zlib -Dcimg_use_opencv -I/usr/include/opencv -Dcimg_use_magick -I/usr/include/GraphicsMagick -Wall -g -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIE -fstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -O2 -pthread -Dcimg_use_fftw3 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpthread -lX11 -lXext -lXrandr -ltiff -lIlmImf -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lz -lcv -lhighgui -L/usr/lib -fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -L/usr/lib/X11 -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lGraphicsMagick++ -lGraphicsMagick -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper -ljpeg -lpng -lwmflite -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread -lltdl -lfftw3 In file included from CImg_demo.cpp:48: ../CImg.h: In destructor 'cimg_library::cimg::Magick_info::~Magick_info()': ../CImg.h:2411: error: 'DestroyMagick' is not a member of 'Magick' make[3]: *** [CImg_demo] Error 1 So this problem seems to be consistent between ImageMagick and GraphicsMagic. BTW, how did you builded the Debian packages. If you would use the building stuff I'm providing you would most probably run into this problem. This lets me come back to the remark from yesterday I would like to repeat: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:06:26 +0100 From: Andreas Tille <[email protected]> To: [email protected] ... According to the Debian files I honestly think that they do not really solve problems but might create some. It is not a good idea if you, Debian (and probably other derived distros) are competing in providing different packages featuring the same name. Moreover you are not providing source packages (for instance the source package would have answered my question above whether you used a patch or a new upstream version). Instead of providing your own Debian packages at SF I would rather suggest to ping me and I would try to keep up with releasing the Debian packages officially. -------------------------------------------------------------------- I would really apreciate if we could coordinate the effort of building Debian packages somehow. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
