Micha Lenk <mi...@debian.org> wrote: Hi,
> This is fine with me, but shouldn't we instead use a virtual package such as > (the currently not yet existing package) 'multicast-routing-daemon' that both smcroute is *NOT* a multicast routing daemon :) A multicast routing daemon is a daemon that manages the multicast routing table dynamically based on IGMPv3 signalling. So the virtual package thing doesn't apply here; it could make sense between xorp and pimd, as they both handle multicast routing. The proper thing to do here is to demote smcroute to Priority: extra and leave pimd at Priority: optional. The pimd/xorp situation should be investigated, as I'm not sure both can be installed at the same time either. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
