Hi, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:49:30PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Montag 24 Januar 2011, 17:50:00 schrieb Michael Banck: > > Also note that the syncml plugin has been sort of orphaned upstream, if > > you need this for some bigger project, I suggest getting involved > > upstream. > > A synchronisation solution without SyncML?
Well, one could say ActiveSync is gaining traction. Anyway, just the guy who mostly hacked on libsyncml and the syncml plugin over the last years has moved on, he is not the original author. There seem to be a couple of major bugs in syncml/libsyncml currently, and so far nobody has stepped up to fix them, but this is open source, somebody might show up in a while (people showed up to fixup the akonadi plugin, e.g.). > So Funambol is the only solution for a SyncML client in the long term? There's syncevolution/libsynthesis as well, you might want to evaluate that. > I would get involved upstream for sure but I am currently working on OpenOBEX > and obexpushd upstream which takes all of the time I can spend for such tasks. > Actually, I was hoping for the akonadi plugin, so I could sync my KDE and > Horde installations. There's a couple of loose ends right now, but the akonadi plugin seems to be moving forward slowly. Once squeeze is out and I find some time, I might try to start packaging subversion snapshots in experimental, because the current release frequency of opensync is just too slow to be useful. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
