On Apr 16, rleigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > > Maybe your initramfs was not rebuilt to include the code which > > mounts /run? > Why would that be required? /run is mounted by mountkernfs, > before udevd is started. Because if /run in the initramfs does not exist or is not a tmpfs then /dev/.udev/ will be used instead. This will break some LVM features, but is not supposed to break anything else.
> Well, it would probably be best if you could install the updated > sysvinit package yourself and find out, since you're the udev Not right now. > But as said repeatedly, you simply *can* *not* use /run without > a versioned dependency on initscripts. This is because there is > a window between initscripts being unpacked (/run created) and > being configured (/run gets a tmpfs mounted). Without the versioned > dependency, you could find yourself using it when it's not actually > usable, which will cause breakage. This is a hard requirement, you > can't avoid it and not cause breakage. Actually I think I did: in this scenario /run/udev/ will NOT be used because /run is not a tmpfs. > While it might be good to have /run mounted by the initramfs, udev > should not break if it is not mounted at that point, which is the > case right now. It is not supposed to. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
