Hi! Am 14.06.2011 05:45, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
>> Checking reverse dependencies... >> # Broken Depends: > Are reverse dependencies a hinderance to removing the source package? In that amount? Yes. On request of the release team we might ignore some breakage. > I thought that the binary packages stick around in the archive until > they are no longer referenced, then automatically removed. That's true for testing: Packages get removed from unstable, but will stick in testing till the dependencies are resolved. So removing boost1.42 will still cause quite some annoyances in unstable. >> # Broken Build-Depends: > > I know that build-deps are a problem. I don't know why I > had overlooked that. > > I checked out the current state and there are presently 7 > packages with build-deps on Boost 1.42. I've filed a bug > for each of the following source packages: Thanks! Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
