Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> >> If the existing macros were replaced, then this would have the >> negative effect that any program that does require Xt would now >> successfully configure even though it would fail to compile or >> link. It would also be a confusing divergence from upstream. I >> am not in favor of this solution. > > I'd rather have this fixed upstream that have this as a Debian > specific fix. Having this just fixed in Debian really is of no > use. And asking the Debian maintainer of the packages is the > obvious choise for me to get this to upstream.
Well, I can write up a patch and send it to upstream, but that's no guarantee it'll be picked up. It is a backward-incompatible change. If that's what you want, I can probably do it sometime this week. (I am very busy right now.) -- Ben Pfaff email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://benpfaff.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
