On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:16:15PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello there, > > almost two years have passed since the last maintainer upload, so I'm > afraid this might sound somewhat bitter, but well... > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:17:45 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Stephan A Suerken wrote: > > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > What is going on with this bug report ? > > > > > > Mercy, please don't remove ;). > > > > > > I have been rather busy recently, but I will catch up with my > > > packages very soon now. > > > > Do you think you will be able to make a new uae upload in time, or do > > you want help. Ideally, the new upload should be held before October 15, > > so it will not be considered as ground for removal. > > > > If you want, i am even willing to become a co-maintainer for uae. > > Just for your interest, I was able to build uae-0.8.25, the most recent > upstream release, on i386 in an up-to-date Sid pbuilder chroot after > applying some changes in the spirit of Andreas Jochen's patch in > bug#297251. Just coming back now from a round of Giana Sisters...
Oh, well, this is due to gcc-4.0 migration. And the gist of Andreas patch is to remove the static declarations. I don't have the original code, so maybe you could have a look, but if the problem is that those symbols are declared static in custom.c and not-static in custom.h or vice-versa, then you have to check which one makes sense. Basically, it is crazy to declare a variable static, and then to try to export it via a header file, since static variables are supposed to be local to the file they are in. So, all in all, i think this makes sense. I will try to do a powerpc build in a week or two, maybe in oldenbourg. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
