Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: libsigcx > Version: 0.6.5-1 > Severity: important > > Hi Andreas, > > Would it be possible to transition libsigcx to build against > libsigc++-2.0 instead of against libsigc++-1.2? It seems this would be > of benefit from the standpoint of reducing the number of old libs in > etch. > These libraries have a quite different API, so libsigcx would have to be ported to libsigc++-2.0. I'd rather consider dropping libsigcx and all dependant packages (all maintained by me) from etch, as I'm less and less interested in C++ and doing the nescessary work to port it to libsigc++ 2.0.
Cheers, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com Software Patents: Where do you want to stifle inovation today? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
