Hi,
Am 24.10.2011 12:52, schrieb Hideki Yamane:
>> libgksu (2.0.13~pre1-5) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> * Switch to dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt).
>> * debian/control.in:
>> - Wrap dependencies.
>> - Remove obsolete versioned Build-Depends on dpkg-dev.
>> - Add ${misc:Depends} to libgksu2-dev.
>> - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2. No further changes.
>> - Remove obsolete Conflicts/Replaces.
>> * debian/patches/02_format-security.patch:
>> - Fix build failure with [-Werror=format-security]. Closes: #643423
>> * debian/patches/28_ld_no_as_needed.patch:
>> - Fix build failures with binutils-gold. Thanks Matthias Klose for the
>> patch. Closes: #555180
>> * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 8.
>> - Update Build-Depends on debhelper.
>> - Strip debian/tmp/ from .install files and simplify them a bit.
>>
>> -- Michael Biebl <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:43:21 +0200
>
> I also want l10n update for libgksu, sent patch and wait it for _3 years_
> see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503461
>
> It's important for l10n, and I don't want to hear someone says "hey, Debian "
> is not well localized, there's just English message. But Ubuntu is good, so "
> we encourage you to use Ubuntu, not Debian"... anymore.I don't see how Ubuntu is relevant here, tbh. That said I don't see them shipping this patch either. > Please consider to apply it (or should I do NMU for that?) I'm not really the maintainer of libgksu. I just did some housekeeping and keep the package building, ie. fix RC bugs only. Looking at other l10n updates, kov did handle that via upstream releases from what I can see, so I didn't want to divert from that. That said, libgksu is ttbomk pretty much dead upstream so I don't know how kov want's to deal with that. kov? Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
