On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 13:33 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'm not really the maintainer of libgksu. I just did some housekeeping > and keep the package building, ie. fix RC bugs only. > > Looking at other l10n updates, kov did handle that via upstream releases > from what I can see, so I didn't want to divert from that. > That said, libgksu is ttbomk pretty much dead upstream so I don't know > how kov want's to deal with that.
Yeah, upstream would be best, but with the advent of policykit I think the need for libgksu has been mostly covered by a better solution, so I want to have gksu disappear in its current form ASAP. For wheezy I want to have gksu-polkit take over to cover those remaining use cases that did not migrate to policykit proper, though, and I plan to work on that. But feel free to divert and update the package with the translation meanwhile if you think it's worth it - I am sorry I neglected this patch so much, but it may not be worth it anymore =(. Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[email protected]> Debian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
