On 2011/10/13 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 10:08 +0200, D. Barbier a écrit : >> On 2011/10/11 Adam C Powell IV wrote: >> > Dear Denis, >> > >> > Denis (and others on the CC list), what do you think? Can we keep the >> > same source package name, unless/until OCE diverges away from the main >> > OCCT? >> >> I have mixed feelings about package names. OCE developers decided to >> not use OCC or OpenCascade names in order to make it clear that this >> product is not endorsed by OpenCascade SAS. On the other hand, it is >> of course much more convenient to keep the same names. My preference >> goes to s/opencascade/oce/ in source and binary package names though. > Idem. Different teams, "different" projects => different names...
Hello, I just pushed a db/debian branch into upstream repository https://github.com/tpaviot/oce/tree/db/debian It will not be merged into our trunk, I pushed it there since I did not know where to publish it. It has been minimally tested, but needs more polishing. So, how do we proceed now? Do we change package names, as in this branch? If yes, do we switch to a new repository? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
