Hi Peter, thanks for the report, looking a t the problem I prefer to add "linux-any" on debian/control architecture list, I don't like the other solution. I'm going to fix this issue today or tomorrow.
Best Regards, francesco Il giorno sab, 26/11/2011 alle 23.38 +0000, peter green ha scritto: > package: cryptkeeper > serverity: serious > > Currently there are uninstallable cryptkeeper packages on kfreebsd-i386 > and kfreebsd-amd64. cryptkeeper should not be allowed to build on > architectures where it's dependencies (in this case encfs) are not > available. Currently this issue is preventing the new version of > cryptkeeper (and hence the fix for 554291) migrating to testing. > > There are two ways to achive this, one is to set the architecture list > ot linux-any like cryptkeeper, the other is to place a build-dependency > on encfs. > > Once this bug is fixed a removal bug should be filed for the useless > kfreebsd packages. > > -- .''`. Francesco Namuri : :' : http://namuri.it/ `. `' key ID = 187B2D8E `- fingerprint = C0F7 9593 F613 C75A EC0A DFBF 56E2 F903 187B 2D8E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
