Russ Allbery wrote: > Maybe we should just > document them as they are and be explicit about the limitations, saying > things like: > > The information in the Vcs-* header should be sufficient to locate the > repository used for packaging and access it anonymously. It may or > may not be the branch used for packaging any specific version of the > package, and the packaging is not necessarily on the default branch. > Additional investigation is often required to find the part of the > repository used for current development or for any particular version > of the package. > > If, over time, debcheckout and our package metadata starts making more > explicit guarantees, we can always tighten the language later, but the > above reflects the current state of the archive.
That sounds sensible to me. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
