Charles Plessy wrote: > For Git, as discussed in this thread, it is not possible to specify the branch > in the URL. I hope that it will be possible one day
Git URLs deliberately represent a repository, not a branch. That is because branches and repositories for a package are simply different notions in git (unlike in Subversion, where they are both described by a path relative to the root of a repository shared by multiple packages). This is not specific to Git but is a feature shared by CVS, for example. To represent a branch in a remote repository, one generally uses a Git URL, followed by a space, followed by the branch name. This is the syntax accepted by "git pull": git pull git://git.example.com/path/to/repo for-charles And it is the syntax generated by pull requests with the "git request-pull" command. All that said, I'm happy with any delimiter for the Vcs-Git field, as long as it is not too ugly and it works. And regarding git, I am happy to be proven wrong if someone has ideas that lead to a better workflow without breaking existing users too much (file a bug report when you find them.:)). Hope that helps, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org