On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:33:27AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 03:01:33PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Membership of > > > > sounds better than > > > > Membership in > > > > to me so I'll suggest that. > > No, *membership* is the term I'm complaining about. When a ticket is made a > child of a parent ticket, it doesn't become its "member" in the same way a > user becomes a "member" of a group.
This seems to be a matter of opinion; membership seems like the correct terminology to me: the child tickets are indeed forming an implicit group around the parent tickets. At this stage, may I suggest that you raise this upstream now, because I think changing the terminology of the system in that way is likely to be controversial and it's not the sort of change I would want to make in Debian without there being general agreement in the wider community (and given I don't see the need for change, I'm not the right person to be taking the debate upstream). The rt-users list is probably a good place to start: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users> Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
