Yavor Doganov <[email protected]> (22/12/2009): > Thanks for the report.
No problem. > Does the package build successfully with noopt? I would put my bet > that there's no ICE with -0O. If so, it would be hard [1] to figure > out in which version the GCC regression occurred, because the last > few successful builds were unoptimized due to a bug in > gnustep-make... Indeed, builds fine on kfreebsd-amd64 with noopt… > [1] Not hard, actually, it's just that building many GCC versions is > no fun :/ Ouch. There's a Debian package snapshot system being developed currently, currently available as stabile:5001, which might help getting already built packages. I might have a quick look at least with gcc-4.3. > > I believe amd64 is so widespread that it shouldn't be too hard for > > you to get preprocessed sources > > Hmm, not widespread at all in my lair/neighborhood unfortunately. > fencepost.gnu.org is the only machine I have access to, but the > toolchain there is ancient. I'll build manually whatever is needed > to reproduce and submit a bug to the GCC people. I can provide you with a complete build tree, or extract whatever info you need, I have a kfreebsd-amd64 porterbox handy (but not available from the internet). We can discuss the details in private, and only post the relevant bits to this bugreport. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
