Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:48:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 03:08:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 20:08:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIHRk-0001iu-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:08:28 -0700
Received: from c-66-30-24-130.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([66.30.24.130] 
helo=[192.168.0.161])
        by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EIHRi-0007zm-Rw; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:08:26 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:08:26 -0400
From: cckemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: swig is unavailable in testing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: swig
Version: 1.3.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: swig is unavailable in testing

There does not appear to be a version of swig in
debian testing. In order to install swig I needed
to download it and related packages from an alternate
distribution. It seems to exist in oldstable, stable, and
unstable. Stable and unstable use the same version.

Package swig

    * oldstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code.
      1.1.p883-4: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 
sparc
    * stable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code
      1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc 
s390 sparc
    * unstable (interpreters): Generate scripting interfaces to C/C++ code
      1.3.24-1: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc 
s390 sparc

Thanks,

Charlie


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages swig depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared 
libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.0.1-2  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                    1:3.3.6-7  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

swig recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329481-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 05:48:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 22:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIJwY-0004KU-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:48:26 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de 
[134.106.38.27])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BF18596;
        Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:48:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id E884FBF827; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:48:43 +0200
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cckemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329481: swig is unavailable in testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

cckemp wrote:
> Package: swig
> Version: 1.3.24-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: swig is unavailable in testing

Filing release critical bugs will, by definition, keep the package out
of testing until the bug is closed.

# removed to let gmp in because the new version has a compound FTBFS
# chain on s390
remove pike7.6/7.6.24-2 pexts/0.2.0-1 swig1.3/1.3.24-1

Closing this counterproductive bug.

--=20
see shy jo

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDMkW7d8HHehbQuO8RAlXxAKDraV31omoZBZbLgNVJFg3ZBinfBQCguhqX
1dtd9B5LLfI0xuLIwkuVwjk=
=3lyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to