On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > Thank you for not Cc-ing me. Can be my fault, I'd the thought as a bugreport owner, you'll get all mails.
> However there are several problems left: > - ceph-common depends on python-flask and python-ceph. Why this is a problem? What I see is that python-flask should be moved to python-ceph . > - ceph-common is not _arch-all_, why does it exist? Tools that used by other packages that can be installed independently. Should it be named like ceph-base or ceph-tools? > - Why ceph-mds? Ceph has three independent blocks. Metadata servers (-mds) are one of them. Please see the overview[1]. > - ceph depends on fdisk, parted and whole lot other crap it does not > need. Agree on this. Don't know how it made there. > - A lot of Replaces. There were package renames, users may have packages from upstream or Ubuntu. That's make it complex. > - python-ceph needs stricter dependencies. Will check. > - Split between -java and -jni for no apparent reason, it only add a > package to the global index. James? > About the debug packages: I can also ask ftp-team to kill it, because it > ten packages that can't be used independently fills the package index. Still not sure they should be integrated. In a rush now, may write more later. Laszlo/GCS [1] http://ceph.com/docs/next/cephfs/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
