Hi Chris,
>Sorry, I must not have communicated that well - I was not suggesting >that you actually remove the autoreconfing, it was only a suggestion >where you initially start your debugging. I mentioned it so it might >save you a small amount of time fixing the underlying issue. > >Autoreconfing is a good practice and it would be a shame to revert it. >Besides, this might be a deeper bug in dh-autoreconf that needs >investigating. this is true, however I'm not a perl guy, neither an autoreconf fan, and I just don't understand it so much. I adopted this package because of boinc, and I prefer to just don't touch it anymore until it breaks again :) there is no active upstream, and I'm not sure I'll have time to dig into this issue. Moreover the broken one was 4 days old, and when I uploaded it I didn't see this RC :) so fixing was my real priority :) (patches are *really* welcome, because I really have difficulties in maintaining such buildsystem) cheers, G.
