On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 09:41:54PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I'm not sure why the -removal- bug #996691 is -also- tagged wontfix > > however. > > "Upstream project discontinued" is not something that we can/should be > fixing (unless there is someone in Debian willing to become the new > upstream, which I suspect is not the case). I tagged the RC bug as wontfix > to indicate that anyone doing QA work should either ignore it, or fix the > reasons why cogl cannot be removed instead. > > It isn't a removal bug unless/until it gets assigned to ftp.debian.org, and > if we reassigned it to ftp.debian.org before fixing its blocker bugs, the > ftp team would just ignore it.
Alright. To me it was a bit unclear if that meant "this should be done, but we will not do it anyway". Thanks for clarifying. Best, Chris
