Hi,

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 2:39 PM Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reopen -2
> Control: retitle -2 guile-3.0: segfaults on riscv64
> Control: notfound -2 3.0.10+really3.0.10-6
> Control: found -2 3.0.11-1
> Control: block -1 by -2
>
> Ping, but let's split of the segfault bug instead of just mentioning it
> in the fails to migrate bug.
>

>From the original message, guile-3.0 migrated to testing, which was
blocked by guile-fibers and shepherd:


∙ ∙ Autopkgtest for guile-fibers/1.4.2-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass,
i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, riscv64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: Pass
∙ ∙ Autopkgtest for shepherd/1.0.9-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, i386:
Pass, ppc64el: Pass, riscv64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: Pass

I have a simple look at this. Fortunately shepherd[0] got one green
light on riscv64 after triggering.

For guile-fibers,i t has a chance of failing or passing on hardware of
the same specifications. I assume its debci load might be different at
different times? In general, it has passed the autopkgtest on more
high performance hardware(Sifive P550):

https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/guile-fibers/testing/riscv64/68144919/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/guile-fibers/testing/riscv64/68131820/


[0]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/shepherd/testing/riscv64/
[1]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/guile-fibers/testing/riscv64/

BR,
Bo

Reply via email to