On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 2026-10-07 at 14:46:31 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Control: tag -1 pending > > > I've prepared an update to the latest upstream release that includes a > > fix for this, and the libpaper addition, and I'll be uploading the NMU > > right away to the DELAYED 7 day queue. > > > > The current changes are in the repo: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/guillem/debian-pkg-paps > > > > Once/if the upload reaches sid, I'd push those changes to the repo under > > the debian namespace. Otherwise let me know if you want me to cancel the > > delayed NMU. > > On Wed, 2026-10-07 at 16:35:23 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2026 at 4:01 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Control: tags 1143686 + patch > > > > I've prepared an NMU for paps (versioned as 0.8.0-0.2) and uploaded > > > it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > Ah it seems our NMUs crossed. :) > > > Your NMU is welcomed. You can upload it to the regular queue. > > While I agree disabling Werror for Debian builds should be done, I think > the new upstream version correcting the actual problem is the better fix > here. The disabled Werror could be done on top of the new upstream > update. Should I move my NMU into the normal queue (overriding Adrian's > one), or should I cancel mine? Or prepare a 0.8.1-0.2 integrating > Adrian's change on top and upload that instead? :)
My NMU went in due to inaction since there was no maintainer reaction. While I was aiming at the minimal fix with my NMU, as user of paps (though not in unstable) I wouldn't personally be unhappy about seeing a more recent version. Not my decision, just my opinion. > Thanks, > Guillem cu Adrian
