Any help is welcomed. You can upload 0.8.1 if you want.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 3:34 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, 2026-10-07 at 14:46:31 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 pending
> >
> > > I've prepared an update to the latest upstream release that includes a
> > > fix for this, and the libpaper addition, and I'll be uploading the NMU
> > > right away to the DELAYED 7 day queue.
> > >
> > > The current changes are in the repo:
> > >
> > >   https://salsa.debian.org/guillem/debian-pkg-paps
> > >
> > > Once/if the upload reaches sid, I'd push those changes to the repo
> under
> > > the debian namespace. Otherwise let me know if you want me to cancel
> the
> > > delayed NMU.
> >
> > On Wed, 2026-10-07 at 16:35:23 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2026 at 4:01 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Control: tags 1143686 + patch
> >
> > > > I've prepared an NMU for paps (versioned as 0.8.0-0.2) and uploaded
> > > > it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
> >
> > Ah it seems our NMUs crossed. :)
> >
> > > Your NMU is welcomed. You can upload it to the regular queue.
> >
> > While I agree disabling Werror for Debian builds should be done, I think
> > the new upstream version correcting the actual problem is the better fix
> > here. The disabled Werror could be done on top of the new upstream
> > update. Should I move my NMU into the normal queue (overriding Adrian's
> > one), or should I cancel mine? Or prepare a 0.8.1-0.2 integrating
> > Adrian's change on top and upload that instead? :)
>
> My NMU went in due to inaction since there was no maintainer reaction.
>
> While I was aiming at the minimal fix with my NMU, as user of paps
> (though not in unstable) I wouldn't personally be unhappy about seeing
> a more recent version.
>
> Not my decision, just my opinion.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Guillem
>
> cu
> Adrian
>

Reply via email to