On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El domingo, 3 de diciembre de 2006 10:04, Anton Altaparmakov escribió:
> > The linux-ntfs CVS now contains an adapted ntfsresize that restores the
> > old behiour where the volume is not modified until the user says "yes" to
> > begin modifications. That is a lot less work than changing the
> > documentation + output messages of ntfsresize and it is "least surprise"
> > for users who upgrade to new version.
> >
> > The only difference to Szaka's version is that ntfsresize now only sets
> > the dirty flag if the volume is not already dirty and it only empties the
> > journal if it is not already empty. It seems silly to do things that are
> > already the case especially when they are things that can take a while
> > like emptying the journal.
>
> Thank you very much, guys. What should we do know, apply the two-line
> patch
> from Szaka to 1.13.1, wait for 1.14, backport any other change...?
Entirely up to you. If you want it immediately it is easiest if you apply
the two-line patch from Szaka now and make your release and then when the
next ntfsprogs release is done (it will be 2.0 not 1.14 btw) then you can
release that.
Sound good?
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
