On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:53 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote: > > I think I could fix upstream fontconfig to do a more careful check when > > fc-cache is run and finds font files newer than the cache for their > > directory. I don't do that at library initialization time for > > performance reasons, as font files are generally not upgraded in place. > > > > That would avoid the need to run dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig (which is > > certainly a bad plan). The alternative is to fix font packages to run > > fc-cache -f on their target directories. > > Perhaps you can hook a fontconfig cache update with defoma?
So far, I've studiously avoided defoma; it's doing weird things with fonts (symlinks to /var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d?). I'll take a look at it and see if that makes any sense. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
