> > I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and > > only the released images, on the master site. > > > > Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the > > master site, and are only present as jigdos that generate .iso files, > > but the fact that the files under potato-test are not .iso files > > hopefully acts as a "I don't think we're in Kansas any more" hint to > > people that should be in the versioned directory > > That's kinda silly. By that reasoning shouldn't we give the .deb's in > testing a .raw extension? I don't think it occurs to many (any?) people > that the reason for the .raw extension is that the .iso hasn't been > released yet; instead, people just think .raw is a nutty convention.
I agree with you. Maybe it would be clearer: debian-3.0-disk1-NOT-READY-YET.iso ;-) -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-1118 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
