On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote: > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of > anything more appropriate. > > The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area contains > one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a jigdo and a > snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels in the > hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion. > > I'm open to suggestions for a better name for where we keep > jigdo/snapshot combinations, but I don't think "jigdo" is it.
jigdo-source jigdo-base isoimage etc, -jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
