On Fri, 17 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote: > > > "jigdo/", not "jigdo-area/". (Not that it really matters...) > > > > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of > > anything more appropriate. > > > > The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area > > contains one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a > > jigdo and a snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels > > in the hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion. > > That's true. > > Why not call the topmost dir "jigdo" and leave out the second one, i.e. > snapshot in "jigdo/2.2r6/snapshot/" > jigdo/template files in "jigdo/2.2r6/i386"
Well, it isn't jigdo that is distributed there. It is jigdo files for use with jigdo. > Or what about "cd-images"? > snapshot in "cd-images/2.2r6/snapshot/" > jigdo/template files in "cd-images/2.2r6/jigdo/i386" This would seem better. I'm fine with "jigdo-area/" though. /Mattias Wadenstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
