On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > >On the other hand, I really think gluck is not the machine we should > >be using to produce all this, it's always overloaded and seems to > >struggle when it comes to disk access, something we do a lot when > >producing our images, even using jte. > > > >So, isn't there any other machine in the project that we could use to > >produce the testing cd/dvd images? Are we really that short on > >machines? > > I seem to remember some vague mentions of spohr being a good > candidate, but this is old info and I don't know if it is still > correct, especially since it works as bugs.d.o now. Word is that it is > pretty idle though.
It's not usually desperately loaded, although occasionally a big spam run can cause issues. It's probably less bad than gluck, although I think I might have concerns about running cdimage on a restricted machine; it's very useful for d-i developers to be able to log in and poke about at what went wrong with a CD build. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
